| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
1. Open 0.0 to all. Start with the west and north!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ElQuirko wrote: Maybe we should fight Goons with their own weapon - the jihading rifter swarm. Now that supercaps have no anti-frig ability at all, the blob is helpless in the face of the rifter swarm You waz trolling me but I gave you a ...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 22:02:00
|
2. Recent CSM/Mittani High Sec/Null Sec issues - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ladie Harlot wrote: testobjekt wrote: Tell me one change or point me to one detail in CSM minutes that would suggest that CSM6 is doing damage to your highsec-no-risk paradise. As far as i can see, the changes in the last year made highsec s...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 21:58:00
|
3. Open 0.0 to all. Start with the west and north!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ladie Harlot wrote: So far met worst is shaping up to be one of the better gimmick posting accounts of the year. I'm actually a Goon alt doing an MMO psych thesis entitled : The Frog Wont Jump. This is the prologue. Your comments will be att...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 21:47:00
|
4. Open 0.0 to all. Start with the west and north!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dear Carebears and Eastern Residents of High Repute, The CFC war machine. That rolling thunder like sound heard across the North, the South-West and anywhere else the CFC thinks THEY should own! They are Eve's Greatest Thugs and Bullies, Baa none...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 21:35:00
|
5. Public Submittal to the Mittani - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Caladan Rake wrote: The Mittani wrote: mittens 2012: safe, sane, consensual This is a man I could get behind... he'll only accept a reach around.
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 20:36:00
|
6. 64bit Client available? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Liu Ellens wrote: As for the raw comparison between 32 and 64bits, I'd like to remind you of this devblog (includes detailed graphics and all) Now if only that were about dynamic processing instead of static data storage.
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 20:27:00
|
7. PI TAX Change - Taxing the New and Poor, Thanks CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Doc Fury wrote: IGNATIUS HOOD wrote: FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: Doc Fury wrote: 26.5% were new and low SP Alts perhaps. Agreed. Everyone I know who does serious PI work has several alts they trained just long enough to fly haulers ...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 20:17:00
|
8. Quick question. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Can a cap maintenance bay be used in lowsec? Just picked up a Erebus on d-scan that wasn't there before. No cyno. Ofc, he may have logged in system but I wasn't sure about the cap bay so thought I'd ask.
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 05:42:00
|
9. Daytripping lowsec. A consequential benefit? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eternus8lux8lucis wrote: Yeah start doing this on a daily basis and watch what happens when you light that cyno and you get redropped by whoever and your small tower, cap and everything goes poof. You might get away with this here and there b...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 05:22:00
|
10. Daytripping lowsec. A consequential benefit? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DIsposible Hero wrote: Because the risk just isn't worth the reward. Unless there are massive clusters of ABC ore in lowsec that i'm not aware of, nobody is going to go to lowsec just to mine. Anyone with enough experience and a tough enough sh...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 04:25:00
|
11. Daytripping lowsec. A consequential benefit? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I waxed lyrically recently about PI in lowsec yadda ya and I see many posts regarding low lowsec populations etc. I was inclined to draw the conclusion that lowsec is unfixable, aka broken. But then I started daytripping. No, not acid drops at br...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 01:54:00
|
12. CCP you want to fix low sec?? IF you REALLY want to then listen to me. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lord Xyr'dan wrote: No cause it doesnt matter who it was. The fact remains that supers dont belong ganking stuff in low sec. They should be able to move and activate defense modules.. otherwise move them back to null. They are for sov warfare. ...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 01:22:00
|
13. Low Sec Borders between the Empires- Boost Lowsec and balance hisec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Fredfredbug4 wrote: met worst wrote: Fredfredbug4 wrote: Buzzmong wrote: Just...no. All your proposed idea will do is create islands of high sec. The *ONLY* way your idea will even half work is if Concord or the various faction Navie...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 01:14:00
|
14. RMT & Botting - pertaining to who does what, where and under said auspices ... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
8 just in case you don't.
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 01:06:00
|
15. Low Sec Borders between the Empires- Boost Lowsec and balance hisec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Fredfredbug4 wrote: Buzzmong wrote: Just...no. All your proposed idea will do is create islands of high sec. The *ONLY* way your idea will even half work is if Concord or the various faction Navies sit on the gates in these low sec border ...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 00:51:00
|
16. Low Sec Borders between the Empires- Boost Lowsec and balance hisec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What happens when you put limitations/barriers between areas of residence? Apart from the obvious formation of ghettos two things will happen 1) No one moves. Carebears fear lowsec! 2) Those that do move will die to camps or only be able to move...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 00:33:00
|
17. Ways to improve EVE gameplay and graphics? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hicksimus wrote: Things to bring EvE to 2012...or at least 2009! More effects: Some depth of field, possibly SSAO, basically do what other companies are doing to hide that they aren't making much progress in texture quality Better Textures: T...
- by met worst - at 2012.02.02 00:15:00
|
18. Numbers: Mining 'carebears' and casuals WAY prevalent - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Skydell wrote: And if you did a log check I'm sure you would find there was a High sec wormhole in the systems that sold them at the time The logs show nothing.
- by met worst - at 2012.02.01 22:44:00
|
19. CSM for High Sec? Isnt April the first a few months away? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Corina Jarr wrote: You admit to being an idiot. Thats more than most ever do. If you ran, I'd at least give you one vote. The other two are taken already. You're going to vote for 3 idiots?!
- by met worst - at 2012.02.01 21:39:00
|
20. Numbers: Mining 'carebears' and casuals WAY prevalent - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: Either that or a lot of PvP'rs are living INSIDE OF A GIGANTIC CLOSET. And I'd be quite happy to see PvP'ers remain in the closet. Can't think of nothing worse than lots of "happy" PvP'ers!!
- by met worst - at 2012.02.01 21:32:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |